Questions in Criminal Justice Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Questions in Criminal Justice - Coursework ExampleDuring the Bram v United States case, the judge gave his verdict in accordance to the rules of the 5th Amendment and stated that if a vindication is to be used in the court, it has to be obtained on voluntary basis (Scheb, 2010, 497). During the third quarter of the twentieth century, criminal cases in which confession was obtained through coercion were not admitted into the court of rightfulness on the basis of the out-of-pocket process. Confession is referred to an individuals bankers acceptance of universe blamable of committing a crime after he has been interrogated and questioned by the law enforcement officers. In contrast to confession, admission refers to an individuals acceptance of being guilty of committing a crime or being a part of a criminal activity without any interrogating questions or behaviour exercised by the law enforcing officers. During the Brown v Mississippi case, the judge stated that a confession shoul d be examined to identify whether the confession was made voluntarily or involuntarily and whether the confession was reliable enough (Scheb, 2010, 497). The ruling in this case was reversed because the police had brutally interrogated the suspect due to this the suspect had confessed to commit the crime. One way of draw close any confession and/or admission made by a suspect s referred to as due process voluntariness approach. According to this approach if a suspect confesses to be guilty if police officials have used coercion while interrogation, the suspects statement of being guilty is not pass judgment during the proceedings of his case. For example in Arizona v Fulminante case, it was found that an cloak-and-dagger federal law enforcer coerced Fulminate and then he confessed to being guilty of first degree murder (McCord, 2012, 419). In this case coercion was not physical in personality rather the coercion was emotional in nature as the undercover federal agent assured to protect Fulminate in prison as there was threat to his life in prison. The undercover agent made the promise to protect while asking for a confession in return. This case was treated under the 14th amendment clause of due process and the court ruled in Fulminates favour, accepting that coercion was applied to obtain a confession. When law enforcing agents apply unlawful mode to obtain a confession from a suspect, this act conducted by the police officials is regarded as violation of an individuals Miranda rights. The process of selection of a control panel starts with the compiling of potential jurors, the compilation of to be jurors need to be unbiased and this compilation is of utmost importance. After the creation of the list of to be jurors, the body of jurors for a particular criminal case are selected. Selection of a body of dialog box out of the compiled potential control panel list is recognized as selecting jurors for jury duty. Jury is said to be selected in three diff erent stages. Firstly a list of to be jurors is compiled, next the jurors expected to be on jury duty in a case are selected and lastly the selection of final jury members is conducted. The numbers of people who fall in the category of probable jury list are recognized as jury pool or list. This list is created through various sources and the best source is the list of registered voters (Neubauer, 2013, p.77). former(a) sources through which this list can be compiled